What is Net Neutrality:
N
|
et neutrality is the principle that
data on the Internet is moved blindly and impartially, without regard to
content, destination or source.
Net neutrality describes
the idea that whoever provides you Internet access—for example, Comcast, Time
Warner, Verizon, and so on—should treat all of your Internet traffic, or
packets of data, the same way.
In the United States, the U.S. agency responsible with upholding
laws related to net neutrality is the Federal Communications Commission (FCC),
which is based in Washington, D.C.
Lets take one
Example,
Let’s say you use Hulu and Netflix, and often
switch between the two to see what’s on. Supporters of net neutrality say that
your broadband Internet service provider (ISP) should not be able to charge
either Netflix or Hulu, or any other company that depends on the Internet, for
a faster connection to you and other customers. Nor should the ISP be able to
charge you more to access certain services.
Lets see
What is Paid Prioritization…….?
The term refers to ISPs charging third party companies for
speedier access to those ISPs’ customers. So, say your ISP is Verizon, and you
use both Twitter and Facebook. If Twitter pays Verizon to “prioritize” its
traffic, and Facebook does not, you would likely experience faster speeds on
Twitter: Its pages and apps would load more quickly, and more reliably, than
Facebook. (This is what net neutrality supporters are talking about when they
discuss “slow lanes” and “fast lanes” on the Internet.)
This arrangement obviously
incentivizes both Twitter and Facebook to pay Verizon to prioritize their
traffic. But both sites are able to pay Verizon in the first place because they’re
already enormous companies, with plenty of money to burn.
And lets know what President Obama has said:
On , 13 April
2015, in response to a
Popular petition
on WhiteHouse.gov, Obama announced
that
he was urging the FCC’s chairman, Tom Wheeler, to implement net neutrality
rules by reclassifying ISPs as common carriers.
What happens now?
Obama does not
have the authority to change the FCC’s rules, so we may be waiting on any kind
of action or decision for the forseeable future. Still, many ISPs are already
sounding the alarm about the potential ramifications of Obama’s effort.
“We disagree with
the President’s statement that an open Internet can only be achieved by
reclassifying broadband as a public utility,” Time Warner Cable CEO Rob Marcus said in a letter echoing his industry’s broader concerns with both
Obama’s agenda and the larger debate about net neutrality. Indeed, whatever the
FCC decides, and eventually implements, that debate is unlikely to end anytime
soon.
And now lets know big update in India is that,
He tweeted saying that when ‘foreign
companies’ offer ‘free services’ it is termed as innovation, hinting at the
recently introduced Facebook-Reliance Internet.org. The Facebook-Reliance
tie-up aims to provide access to popular websites including Facebook with zero
data charge across 2G and 3G platforms.
In case of Airtel Zero, this is a programme
that will allow app developers who tie-up with the company to allow consumers
to access these apps for zero data charge. The app developers, companies will
pay Airtel to keep their app usage free. Flipkart is rumoured to be one of the
early partners in Airtel Zero.
Flipkart CEO Sachin Bansal defended his company’s
decision to tie-up with Airtel, given that they have received a Of negative reponse in light of the news,
especially on social media.
No comments:
Post a Comment